I Analyzed Classified UFO Footage— Ex-USAF Intel Officer Tells All (Ft. Lenval Logan)

I Analyzed Classified UFO Footage- The Jelly fish UFO

Host: Have you ever seen the jellyfish UFO footage?

Lenval Logan: Yes, but there’s several, so you’re going to have to explain which one.

Host: One that I believe Jeremy Corbell puts out. It’s got the tentacles hanging down…

Lenval Logan: Okay, I’m familiar with that one.

Host: It goes through the base, like changing its translucency, allegedly goes into the water, comes out. Did you, when you were working in the UAP Task Force, did you see this?

Lenval Logan: Yes, I did, and that kind of got me into a little trouble—not officially, but with Jeremy. Because when that one came in…

Host: You were in trouble with Jeremy?

Lenval Logan: Yeah, just hear me out, you’ll understand. So the way we did everything was everything came in at the Secret level, and then once we did analysis on it—because we’re using all these extra tools and whatever—it would probably turn up at a higher level depending on what it is, because maybe it’s the source, maybe it’s where it’s located, all these different things could change the classification.

So when that video came in, I was the one that first got it and told my guys, I said, “Run this every which way but loose so we can try and figure out what the hell this thing really is.” All right? And they did. They slowed it down, they changed the contrast, they changed this, you know, everything, just so we could figure it out. And that’s where we left it on the high side.

So then all of a sudden, Jeremy comes out with a copy—not of the original, but the one that I had said got slowed down, pushed forward, and whatever. So my first thing is, I’ve got to ask Jeremy what’s his source, because his sources are good. And then I’m like, but if you tell me your source, I’m going to have to report you, so I’m stuck between a rock and a hard place on that one. I’m not going to ask him, but I called him up and I said, “Dude, I don’t know where the hell you got this video from, but kudos to you and George for getting this video.”

And I said, “But I just want you to know now that I know,” because my friends were calling me that helped me do the video and everything, they’re like, “Hey, did you see the Jeremy video?” “No, I haven’t seen it yet.” “Okay, now I’ve seen it.” “Oh crap. Yeah, dude, that’s the one we did for you.” I was like, “Yeah.”

And I was like, “Let’s talk for a second.” So I told Jeremy, I said, “Dude, I don’t know how you got that video, but if anybody comes knocking on my door, I’m throwing you under the bus right away.” Jeremy’s like, “Logan, we’re…” “No dude, we’re buds to a certain degree.” But he knew I was joking, you know, and we had a good laugh about it.

Lenval Logan: But the video—he was upset because when that video came in, we have like four categories: This is full-on crazy, This is kind of crazy, This is not / eh, could be, and then No. So we put this into—unless we could get a visual ID (we call it vis-rec, visual recognition)—we put it in the “this is kind of interesting here,” so yes, we’re leaning towards this being a UAP.

And Jeremy had got into an argument, he and George Knapp got into an argument with, I believe it was Sarah Gamm. Sarah Gamm told him, “Well, we know what it is,” and when he asked her what it was, she couldn’t tell him. And so he’s looking at me, he’s like, “Hold on a second, Sarah’s part of the task force and all this.” I was like, “Ah, Sarah supported the task force.”

Lenval Logan: Because if you listen to me when I’m on The Program, I use the term: “My name is Logan and I supported the UAP Task Force.” Immediately right after, Jay Stratton calls me up and goes, “What do you mean you supported the task force? I hired you. I personally hired you. You were a part of the task force.” “Yeah, well, you know, I just didn’t want to assume and put my…” right? Because details matter.

Analysis & Sensor Data Breakdown
Host: So what was the jellyfish UFO?

Lenval Logan: I don’t know specifically. It’s in the UAP category from what we were doing, all right? But we wanted to put it there as a placeholder to see if we would see any other objects that carried the same characteristics that were doing the same thing. And one of the more important things we wanted to try and do—I was pushing for this—was we wanted to know where did these things lay their head at night. Are we always seeing them in this location going in that direction? Are they always heading north, heading south, at the same altitude? All the things that we would do to deduce what is going on, the who, what, where, why, when.

Host: Now you said that video that Jeremy had is arguably a misrepresentation though, wouldn’t it be, if it was changing contrast and speed?

Lenval Logan: No, we would change the contrast and speed for how we wanted to look at it, because when you do all that, you see different details. Like if we saw—there’s quite a few things that we’d see that was a balloon, and it wasn’t until we changed the contrast that you could see that there was a string. Most of the time you just see the object and it’s moving around. With Jeremy’s, it was moving along and we were looking for all the other—first of all, we’re like, is this a vis-rec problem where someone has misidentified a bunch of balloons? And then you’re looking at the thermal data that’s coming off it, and you’re seeing some of the things change, and you’re like, okay, that’s not normal. So now it starts going into the “this is something more unusual” category.

Host: With the jellyfish, did you have multisensory data? So did you have more than just what we saw?

Lenval Logan: So in that particular data, it was EO and IR [Electro-Optical and Infrared]. But there’s other things there—remember I told you about MASINT [Measurement and Signature Intelligence]? The MASINT was like, okay, it’s floating along like a balloon, which way is the wind blowing? Is it going along with this thing? And if I remember correctly, there were certain portions where it was going with the wind, and certain portions where it was going against the wind. And that’s when it was like, oh yeah.

Host: Did it go into the water?

Lenval Logan: I did not see that particular part on the first set of videos that I saw; I was analyzing another portion. But the report from the people that were watching it—I read the whole script—and yes, it went into the water and then came back out. And so if you don’t get all the information, you’re like, okay, he’s credible up until this point and he has no reason to lie, so there’s no reason to feel that it did not go in the water. But what we have also seen too is we’ve seen optical illusions where it looks like it goes into the water and it doesn’t actually go, because some things are seen at the horizon, right? When they drop, it looks like it goes into the water—it’s a spatial issue versus the camera.

Host (referencing off-camera producer Jean): I think Jean had a question.

Jean: You talked about where they lay their heads at night. For all the videos that the public normally sees, we see seconds of being followed. Is there any normal pattern of how they stop being tracked? Do they just get out of camera range generally? Do they make a phenomenal, spectacular exit that we’re not seeing?

Lenval Logan: I would say all the above. There was no direct pattern that we could sit there and say, “Whenever he gets to this point, he disappears”—no. “Whenever he gets to this point, he directly ascends”—no. Does he do this? No. But we could sit there and say in all the above, we were like, well, this one just disappeared. Well, how did he disappear? What do you mean? Did we switch? Because there were things that we could not see in EO, but we could see in thermal, and then vice versa. And you’re like, well, how did they do that? You’re trying to tear it apart, and we noticed that when we tried to put them in the category, there was no sharp bell curve that said whenever this happens, this happens—it was just across the spectrum.

Lenval Logan: There’s that style [the Corbell footage], but there’s also a couple other jellyfish videos where there was something in the water and it was huge, and we were like, but that looks like a very large either a very large jellyfish or a large group of jellyfish in the water. And so we were going to marine biologists and trying to, “Hey, can you confirm this? What are we seeing? Here’s where we saw it.” “Oh no, there’s not supposed to be this in that area,” blah blah blah. Stuff like that.

TO WATCH THE FULL EPISODE---->https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffPDbL0yBRI